国王的演讲观后感英文版（精选8篇）

观后感，就是看了一部影片，连续剧或参观展览等后，把具体感受和得到的启示写成的文章。下面是小编整理的国王的演讲观后感英文版，欢迎大家分享。

国王的演讲观后感英文版 篇1

I just watched the film The King's Speech several days ago. It told us a quite touching and inspiring story about King George VI ,overcame his stuttering is the bravest person I have known. Because of the stuttering problem ,he was afraid of speech in the public places, Fortunately,with the help of a little-known Australian speech therapist named Lionel ,he finally found his voice impress me most is the king's giving the speech to the British Nation,which had just inspired all of his people.

The king tried his best to overcome his weakness and improve himself. What we can learn from the king is that we should defeat ourselves and try our best to to seek our dreams the life choose you,you can not give up,just go ahead ,then you will be successful ever the difficulties you'll face ,you should believe yourself .

国王的演讲观后感英文版 篇2

The King's Speech is both a lot funnier and, strangely, a lot more polite than you'd probably expect.

The humour mostly comes from Geoffrey Rush's speech therapist, who aims to cure Colin Firth's Duke of York's terrible stammer. And this is increasingly imperative; as the film begins, reigning monarch King George V is ailing. There is some controversy over the next-in-line – Guy Pearce's Edward. Not only is Edward a bi-plane-flying, party-loving socialite but he is also in a relationship with American divorcee Wallis Simpson ying her would cause a constitutional crisis – and potentially rip apart the Church of England.

With the advent of radio, the monarch must be able to speak well, and Firth may well be in the job sooner than he thinks. After trying many options, wife Helena Bonham Carter's Elizabeth finally turns to an Antipodean, specialising in some rather unconventional techniques, based on London's Harley Street. The Duke and the speech therapist form an unlikely friendship, verbally and even physically bouncing off each other with middle-aged abandon.

These scenes are the backbone of the film. They are funny, entertaining and performed by two actors obviously enjoying themselves enormously. Geoffrey Rush delivers great line after great line and Firth 'reacts' with a deadpan straightness. You'd wish there would be more of these moments. Additional comedy comes from some of the background characters. For instance, Timothy Spall's Winston Churchill rides the line of parody successfully.

As for the film's politeness – some of it comes, predictably, from Firth's monarch-in-waiting. He's mild-mannered and sensitive royalty, and Firth employs a similarly understated approach than that of his work in A Single Man. The portrayal is quintessentially English, and as good as we've come to expect from Firth recently.

The remaining politeness comes from the film's level of drama. There are crown-loads of dramatic potential here – the troublesome father-son relationship between Gambon's truculent, demanding monarch and Firth's stammering son; the tension coming from the American interloper; the painful, unfolding, prelude to the Second World War playing out – but it's all background noise. Sometimes it feels forgotten about entirely, and historical perspective is, almost tastelessly, lost. And although there is a definite direction and development throughout the movie, there's only a sprinkling of edge-of-your-seat material. Any drama is tentative and inoffensive.

So, although there is a lot of humour, crowd-pleasing fun and some award-worthy performances, there is a lack of edge and darkness here. Triumph over adversity is fine if you get the measure of bitter and sweetness right. The King's Speech fails, and the end result is questionable and problematic.

国王的演讲观后感英文版 篇3

I was entirely moved by the king in the film. The king used to stammer severely. Specifically, when he was a little child, he was abused by his step-mother, which gave rise to the stammer. Growing up in the family, he had no alternative but to deliver numerous speeches in public. Nevertheless, he made a painstaking effort to practice pronounciation in order to alleviate the stammer. And eventually he fulfilled his goal. So this movie essentially motivates me to conduct things in our daily life as well as we probably can.

国王的演讲观后感英文版 篇4

Rarely do you get to see a movie that promises a lot and then, lives up to it's promise. The King's Speech is a rare piece, indeed.

The movie starts off with a stammering speech and signs off with a staggering one, with hardly any glitches in between. The basic premise of the movie is fairly simple. A king with a stutter is helped by a maverick speech therapist to overcome his problem and become an inspiring orator. That sounds like a very known territory to most movie goers. But few minutes into the movie, and you realize that this one simply pushes the bar a notch higher.

It is a very pleasing movie, doesn't lead the audience into a lot of uncomfortable questions. However, the artistry lies in the overall balance of the movie. You slowly start getting gripped by David Seidler's screenplay. The actors are superb, takes it slow and steady with superb grip on each of their characters. While Colin Firth puts in a spectacular performance (one you can't miss), Geoffrey Rush goes a bit more old school and pulls off a subtle and deep portrayal. One that fills up your heart but also keeps your brain active. Humor comes in here and there, with a very easy flow and steady pace. Not for a single moment do you perceive the movie as dull. Helena Bonham Carter is good. Guy Pearce is appropriate, though he does look a bit too casual at times (maybe that was an intentional character flaw).

Most of the movie had been filmed indoors, albeit with eloquent art direction. But the occasional sequences shot outside had been filmed very beautifully, portraying a very dreamy picture of the then England. Sometimes, the camera goes in too close to the characters, and stays there for a while, just long enough to give us a sense of suffocation, quite an artistic equivalent of a speech disorder ! But then again, negative shades had been whitewashed with joyous ones and you never perceive it as a dark movie. Direction wise, Tom Hooper is bang on ! This is the kind of a movie where you want to give a lot of credit to the director. The set-up is such that the dramatic elements are high but needs to be tamed, so that it doesn't goes over board. And er hits the bulls eye ! Perfect balance.

All points considered, it's a brilliant movie and a must watch.

【参考译文】

你很少去看一部电影，承诺很多，然后，履行它的承诺。国王的演说是罕见的，确实。

电影开始了与口吃的演讲，做了个惊人的，几乎没有任何瑕疵的。电影的基本前提相当简单。一个口吃的国王是一个特立独行的言语治疗师克服自己的问题，成为一个鼓舞人心的演说家的帮助。这听起来像一个众所周知的'领土，大多数电影观众。但几分钟的电影，你意识到，这一简单推酒吧一个高。

这是一部非常令人愉快的电影，没有引起观众很多不舒服的问题。然而，艺术性在于电影的整体平衡。你慢慢开始抓住David Seidler的剧本。演员是一流的，采取缓慢和稳定与精湛的抓地力对他们的每一个字符。而科林菲尔斯放在一个壮观的表现(一个你不能错过的)，杰弗里·拉什有点更古老，拉了一个微妙的深入刻画。一个充满你的心，但也保持你的大脑活跃。幽默来这里和那里，有一个非常容易流动和稳定的步伐。你一刻也不认为这部电影是乏味的。海伦娜·伯翰·卡特很好。盖·皮尔斯是适当的，虽然他确实看起来有点偶然(有时这是故意的性格缺陷)。

大部分的电影都是在室内拍摄的，尽管有着清晰的艺术指导。但偶尔拍摄的序列拍摄得非常漂亮，描绘了当时的英国梦幻般的画面。有时候，镜头走得太近了，在那里呆了一段时间，只是长到足以让我们窒息的感觉，相当艺术相当于一个言语障碍!但是，消极的色调被粉刷和欢乐的人和你不认为它是一个黑暗的电影。方向明智，汤姆·霍伯榜上!这是一部你想给导演很多荣誉的电影。设置是如此，戏剧性的元素是高的，但需要被驯服，所以它不去板。Hooper先生命中靶心!完美的平衡。

所有的观点认为，这是一部精彩的电影，必须看。

国王的演讲观后感英文版 篇5

This is a biopic about how King George VI, the father of Queen Elizabeth II, overcame his stuttering problem. Widely considered by all but his father unfit to be king, George is reluctantly thrust unto the throne and into the spotlight after his brother is forced to abdicate. Overshadowed on the global stage by powerful orators like Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini, the King relies on the help of a little-known Australian speech therapist named Lionel Logue to find his voice and courageously lead his people into the most devastating war humanity has ever faced.

This is a powerful, hilarious and deeply moving story, told against the backdrop of a critical juncture in modern history, of the emergence of a deep friendship out of a professional relationship between two men who would otherwise never have socially interacted. The screenplay, written by David Seidler (who also wrote Tucker: The Man and his Dream), is excellent. The dry British wit is hilarious. I was literally slapping my knee during some of the scenes. Tom Hooper (Elizabeth I) does a superb job directing this movie. The buildup to the climactic finale is skillfully executed and prompted the audience to erupt into spontaneous applause. (Apparently, this also happened at the Roy Thomson Hall premiere.) Geoffrey Rush (Elizabeth: The Golden Age) does a fantastic job as Lionel Logue and Colin Firth (A Single Man) is excellent as King George VI. I saw the second public screening of this movie at the Ryerson Theater during the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF). Tom Hooper was present to introduce the movie. He was joined by Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush after the movie ended for a brief Q&A.

It turns out that David Seidler also had a stuttering problem as a child and drew inspiration from the king's struggle. Early in his career he wanted to write a screenplay about it. He dutifully asked the Queen Mother for permission. She agreed but told him "not in my lifetime". Little did he know she would live to be 101 and he would have to wait another 30 years.

Another interesting tidbit we learned was that near the end of the shoot, the crew finally located one of Lionel Logue's grandsons, who just so happened to live about 10 minutes away from the director. They got access to Lionel's diaries and correspondence and managed to incorporate some of it into the script.

国王的演讲观后感英文版 篇6

Next is my speech about a movie called The King’s Speech. I saw it about two weeks ago. Actually, it’s a biopic about how King George Ⅵ,the father of Queen Elizabeth Ⅱ,overcame his dumb.

You know, as a King of British,especially when his brother, the famous Duke of Windsa, was forced to abdicate because of love, it is necessary for him to shout out his voice against Adolph Hitler’s powerful speech. But unfortunately every people know that it is impossible because George have stuttering problem.

Thank god,thank Lionel Logue, the Australian speech helped George overcame his problem.

I find that many people think Lionel Logue is the most important for this movie like Aarthi Modoo for Notre Dame de Paris. I admit that he is important what i want to say is George is the man who is worthy of our respect. We can see his try, his hope, his hopelessness in this movie. He lived in the shadow of his father and his brother. He is mute because of nervous. But anyway,he stick it out till the end with trust. “I have a voice !” Yes, do did it. He has the most beautiful and powerful voice in the world.

国王的演讲观后感英文版 篇7

Changjin Lake tells the story of resisting US aggression and aiding Korea. It tells the story of a volunteer company still guarding its position under ice and snow and making great contributions to the Changjin Lake campaign. The whole film is very shocking. Their frozen fragments perfectly show their spirit of returning to death.

Not just these people in the ice and snow Changjin lake. In history, China has changed from a country that was slaughtered by others to one of the best in the world. I think the important node of the transformation is a series of battles in which the weak won the strong during World War II. Yes, before that, there were many battles in history, such as the battle of Chibi, which is familiar to everyone. What is the difference between these battles and World War II? As we all know, in the era of World War II, the best weapon for killing people was firearms. Originally, a series of superb strategic commands such as burning, cutting, sword splitting, archery and grass boat borrowing arrows could be used to reverse the war situation. However, during World War II, there was no joint venture to let you burn, bullets could not be reused, and cold weapons gradually withdrew from the stage of history and replaced with guns one by one, That's a gun. As a long-range weapon, gun also has super power. Whether it has or not often represents the trend of war. But China's broadsword team can also defeat Japanese troops with guns.

As an article in our Chinese textbook said, "I eat snow here just because the people of our motherland don't eat snow. I squat in the air raid shelter here, and the people of our motherland can not squat in the air raid shelter!"

As a minor in the 21st century. I can't imagine their mood, and I should never experience it. This is really a stable day for us brought by them and many of the same people in history.

国王的演讲观后感英文版 篇8

In Changjin lake, watching the US Air Force's dimensionality reduction attack on North Korea, watching the United States eating meat, vegetables and coffee, and our most lovely people eating teeth cold potatoes and watching the heavy equipment of the US Army, my daughter and I cried because we all understood that this war is a difficult war and a war with huge costs and sacrifices, It is a war based on the flesh and blood of countless ancestors!

In Changjin lake, I cried watching American planes shoot our most lovely people. Watching our most lovely people raid the U.S. military in the battle of bombing the signal tower, I also cried. I cried when I saw the final general attack.

No matter Chinese or Americans, every soldier is an individual with parents, families and flesh and blood. Originally, our soldiers should go back to their hometown or build a house to support their parents or watch their children to guide their homework and return to ordinary tea, rice, oil and salt. Originally, American soldiers should prepare for Christmas reunion in their hometown.

However, the American decision-makers who launched the war sent American soldiers to the Korean battlefield, and we had to be involved in the war to protect our country, smash American ambitions and smash the illusion of America's future March.